Seagate Technology Holdings plc
STXAbout the company
Seagate Technology Holdings plc engages in providing data storage solutions in Singapore, the United States, the Netherlands, and internationally. The company offers External and internal hard drives; external and internal solid-state drives (SSDs); enterprise hard drives and SSDs; data storage systems; network attached storage (NAS) hard drives; video and analytics hard drives; and hyperscale and cloud solution. It offers its products for Healthcare, Media & Entertainment, Surveillance & Security, and telecommunication industry.
Investment snapshot
Positive
7
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 6
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$105.00
-88.6% vs price
Models with upside
0 / 16
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
7 of 8 pass — Graham objects
Key risk
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
| Metric | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite | Lynch GARP | Buffett Quality Compounder | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Munger Quality Focus | Ackman Activist Value | Dreman Contrarian Value | Piotroski F-Score | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Graham Defensive Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | BUY | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | PASS | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | PASS | BUY | FAIL · Rank #838 (Top 26.1%) | FAIL |
| Score | ||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Intrinsic Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -215.8% | -165.6% | -777.6% | -795.3% | N/A | N/A | N/A | -1060.9% | -1042.3% | -417.9% | -87.9% | -571.7% | N/A | -907.9% | -1585.6% |
| Data As Of | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) |
Where It Passes
- Efficiency88% pass✓ 10✗ 1▾
7 of 8 pass — Graham objects
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)33.4%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+23.4%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)ROIC (high and growing)FY2024: ROIC=32.9%; FY2025: ROIC=32.9%; FY2026: ROIC=56.4%✓AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC45.2% (RR=80% x ROIC=56.4%)✓AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)3/5 years above 12% (latest 56.4%)✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of yearsReturn on Invested Capital56.4%✓Munger> 15%Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.67✓Dreman> 1.5Current Ratio Change YoY1.38 -> 1.67✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY1.13x -> 1.22x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)156.9%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio1.67✗Graham>= 2.0 - Growth63% pass✓ 9✗ 4▾
5 of 8 pass — Lynch, Neff and Sleep object
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)3.16✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR21.0%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 9.1% vs Rev: 34.1%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR21.0% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 35.2% -> 45.6%, operating margin 20.8% -> 33.6%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR2.7%✗SleepCAGR > 7%5-Year EPS CAGR21.0% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Positive Net Income Frequency24/26 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth34.1%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 yearsEPS Growth Direction$0.36 (2002) -> $13.90 (2026)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR16.4% CAGR over 24 years✓Dreman> 5% annualizedEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)2440.7%✓Graham>= 33% growth - Cash Flow60% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
6 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.49%; #2272/4487 (top 50.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionFCF Positive and Growing$3.1B✓LynchPositive and growingFree Cash Flow Proxy$3.2B✓BuffettPositive and growingP/E or FCF YieldP/E=66.3x, FCF Yield=1.5%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$3.1B✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency25/25 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsFCF Positive22/22 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap1.5%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share67.3x✗Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)56.9x✗Dreman< 8xOperating Cash Flow$3.7B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=36.84%, ROA=31.93%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 2✗ 24▾
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Revenue / market capitalization+0.0584; #4426/5203 (top 85.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / market capitalization+1.52%; #2685/6251 (top 43.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+1.49%; #2272/4487 (top 50.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+135.22%; #246/6203 (top 4.0%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)3.16✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)P/E or FCF YieldP/E=66.3x, FCF Yield=1.5%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Price / Book Value per Share96.44x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2xPrice / Tangible Book Value per Share220.92x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+244.7%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Price / Diluted EPS66.3x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.32✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / EPS66.3x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12xPrice vs. Trailing Low1085% of trailing low ($84.95)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=66.3x, P/B=96.4x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-571.7% (IV=$137.20 vs Price=$921.51)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valueValuation ReasonablenessP/E=66.3x, OE Yield=1.4%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%Price / FCF per Share67.3x✗Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)56.9x✗Dreman< 8xEBIT / Enterprise Value1.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.9%, ROC=156.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / 3-yr avg EPS100.7x✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio96.4x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B9,716.4✗Graham<= 22.5 - Valuation models0% pass✗ 11▾
STX overvalued: all 11 models price fair value below $921.51 (median $105.00)
Lynch fair value$291.84✗Lynch-215.8% margin vs $921.51Buffett fair value$346.97✗Buffett-165.6% margin vs $921.51Pabrai fair value$105.00✗Pabrai-777.6% margin vs $921.51Akre fair value$102.93✗Akre-795.3% margin vs $921.51Templeton fair value$79.38✗Templeton-1060.9% margin vs $921.51Marks fair value$80.67✗Marks-1042.3% margin vs $921.51Munger fair value$177.94✗Munger-417.9% margin vs $921.51Ackman fair value$490.47✗Ackman-87.9% margin vs $921.51Dreman fair value$137.20✗Dreman-571.7% margin vs $921.51Greenblatt fair value$91.43✗Greenblatt-907.9% margin vs $921.51Graham fair value$54.67✗Graham-1585.6% margin vs $921.51 - Debt & Leverage18% pass✓ 4✗ 10▾
9 of 11 flag STX's debt & leverage — Lynch, Buffett, Akre +6 more
Total Debt / Equity1.65✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-1.7B✗LynchPositive preferredDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.65, IC: 14.6x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xDebt Levels1.65✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.65x✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗Dreman< 0.8Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.67x✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)✓Dreman> 1.5Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=14.6x, D/EBITDA=0.8x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity1.65✗Ackman<= 1.0LT Debt / Total Assets Change62.26% -> 33.89%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYLT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $3.4B vs NCA $2.1B✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets - Profitability40% pass✓ 19✗ 12▾
9 of 15 flag STX's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Buffett +6 more
Net income / market capitalization+1.52%; #2685/6251 (top 43.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)3.16✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR21.0%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE146.9%✓Lynch> 15%Net Income Positive (10+ years)24/26 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)119.5%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)33.6% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$3.2B✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)1.02✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdMargin of SafetyP/E=66.3x, P/B=96.4x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity137.1% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR21.0% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 35.2% -> 45.6%, operating margin 20.8% -> 33.6%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-Year EPS CAGR21.0% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend20.8% (2024) -> 33.6% (2026)✓TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsDiscount to Intrinsic Value-571.7% (IV=$137.20 vs Price=$921.51)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency24/26 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue33.6%✓Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity146.9%✓Ackman>= 15%Pre-Tax Income / Revenue30.3%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity146.9%✓Dreman> 12%Net Income / Total Assets31.93%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY18.31% -> 31.93% (delta: +13.62%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=36.84%, ROA=31.93%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY35.2% -> 45.6%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / Enterprise Value1.9%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.9%, ROC=156.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Positive EPS (10 years)23/26 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)2440.7%✓Graham>= 33% growth - Verdicts50% pass✓ 7✗ 7▾
Split decision: 6 FAIL · 5 PASS · 2 BUY · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #744/953 (Top 78.1%))✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✓BuffettPASS (5/9)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✓AkreBUY (5/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)✓SleepPASS (3/6)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✓MungerPASS (2/4)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✓DremanPASS (6/11)✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)✗GreenblattRank #838✗GrahamFAIL (3/9)
Business & financials
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2026
Issued 6.6% of shares last year, 7.9% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- $176.0M
- Dividends
- $634.0M
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years
| Metric | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $209.0B | $86.6Best. | $20.1Best. | $17.1Best. | $12.8Best. |
| Revenue | $12.2B↑34% | $9.1B | $9.1B↑39% | $6.6B↓11% | $7.4B |
| Operating Income | $4.1B↑117% | $1.9B | $1.9B↑318% | $452.0M↑232% | -$342.0M |
| Net Income | $3.2B↑117% | $1.5B | $1.5B↑339% | $335.0M↑163% | -$529.0M |
| EPS (Diluted) | $13.90↑105% | $6.77 | $6.77↑328% | $1.58↓79% | $7.36 |
| Gross Margin | 45.6%↑30% | 35.2% | 35.2%↑50% | 23.4%↑28% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6%↑62% | 20.8% | 20.8%↑201% | 6.9%↑249% | -4.6% |
| ROE | 146.9%↑145% | -324.3% | -324.3%↓1343% | -22.5%↓151% | 44.1% |
| Total Debt | $3.6B↓29% | $5.0B | $5.0B↓12% | $5.7B↑4% | $5.5B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $2.2B↑578% | -$453.0M | -$453.0M↑70% | -$1.5B↓24% | -$1.2B |
| Current Ratio | 1.67↑21% | 1.38 | 1.38↑28% | 1.08↓4% | 1.12 |
| Debt / Equity | 1.65↑115% | -11.03 | -11.03↓190% | -3.81↑16% | -4.55 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $3.7B↑239% | $1.1B | $1.1B↑18% | $918.0M↓3% | $942.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $3.1B↑280% | $818.0M | $818.0M↑23% | $664.0M↑6% | $626.0M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Computers
STX vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc.AAPL | $4.81T | $329.40 | $416.2B | $112.0B | 151.9% | 1.23 | 32.0% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 3/11 |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.CSCO | $420.8B | $106.74 | $56.7B | $10.2B | 21.7% | 0.60 | 20.8% | 1.00 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| Palo Alto Networks IncPANW | $317.7B | $388.41 | $9.2B | $1.1B | 14.5% | 0.00 | 13.5% | 0.94 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPIBM | $207.3B | $219.99 | $67.5B | $10.6B | 32.4% | 1.88 | — | 0.96 | 3/9 | 2/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPWDC | $163.5B | $453.48 | $9.5B | $1.9B | 35.6% | 1.31 | 24.5% | 1.08 | 1/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 3 | 3/11 |
| Fortinet, Inc.FTNT | $130.2B | $175.96 | $6.8B | $1.9B | 149.8% | 0.81 | 30.7% | 1.17 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise CoHPE | $81.6B | $61.49 | $34.3B | $57.0M | 0.2% | 0.91 | -1.3% | 1.01 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 2/11 |
| NetApp, Inc.NTAP | $41.1B | $209.18 | $6.2B | $1.3B | 94.4% | 1.84 | 26.8% | 1.44 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |