NetApp, Inc.

NTAP

NetApp, Inc. provides a range of enterprise software, systems, and services that customers use to transform their data infrastructures in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through two segments, Hybrid Cloud and Public Cloud.

Country: United StatesPrice: $207.08Market Cap: $40.6B

Company Profile

Industry: Computers
SIC Sector: Industrial Machinery & Computing
Size: Large Cap($40.6B)
Revenue: $6.2B+5.6% YoY
Net Income: $1.3B+7.6% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin26.8%
Return on Equity94.4%
Debt / Equity1.84
Current Ratio1.44
EPS (Diluted)$6.35+12.0%
Buybacks (1y)$950.0M
Buybacks (2y)$2.1B
Shares Retired2.5% / 4.9% 2y

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 2.5% of shares last year, 4.9% over two.

Buybacks
$950.0M
Dividends
$413.0M

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
41.6% = 36.0% + 4.1%
FY23
−20.0% = −22.6% + 3.3%
FY24
22.5% = 20.3% + 1.8%
FY25
12.0% = 7.6% + 4.1%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years

MetricFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021
Market Cap$40.6B$23.8Best.$17.1Best.$13.0Best.$17.1Best.
Revenue$6.2B6%$5.9B4%$5.7B11%$6.4B1%$6.3B
Operating Income$1.7B25%$1.3B10%$1.2B19%$1.0B12%$1.2B
Net Income$1.3B8%$1.2B20%$986.0M23%$1.3B36%$937.0M
EPS (Diluted)$6.3512%$5.6722%$4.6320%$5.7942%$4.09
Gross Margin78.5%1%78.1%78.4%18%66.2%1%66.8%
Operating Margin26.8%19%22.6%5%21.5%34%16.0%13%18.3%
ROE94.4%17%114.0%33%86.0%22%109.9%2%111.8%
Total Debt$2.5B38%$4.0B43%$2.8B17%$2.4B17%$2.9B
Shareholders' Equity$1.4B30%$1.0B9%$1.1B1%$1.2B38%$838.0M
Current Ratio1.4414%1.265%1.1912%1.3510%1.50
Debt / Equity1.8452%3.8357%2.4418%2.0640%3.44
Operating Cash Flow$2.1B37%$1.5B11%$1.7B52%$1.1B9%$1.2B
Free Cash Flow$1.9B40%$1.3B13%$1.5B76%$868.0M12%$985.0M
Scored from 10-K1d ago
MetricMarks

Risk-Aware Value

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Druckenmiller

Macro-Enhanced Growth

Spier

Value Checklist

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Munger

Quality Focus

Ackman

Activist Value

Piotroski

F-Score

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Lynch

GARP

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Graham

Defensive Value

VerdictHOLDHOLDHOLDBUYHOLDBUYHOLDBUYNot rankedPASSPASSFAIL
Score
Analysis
Intrinsic Value
Margin of Safety-245.8%-630.2%-39.2%-78.6%-195.1%-39.2%-32.9%-2905.5%-264.8%-125.3%-28.7%-559.9%
Data As Of10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)10-K (2026-08-15)

Where They Agree

  • Valuation models

    NTAP overvalued: all 12 models price fair value below $207.08 (median $81.05)

    Marks fair value$59.88
    Marks-245.8% margin vs $207.08
    Akre fair value$28.36
    Akre-630.2% margin vs $207.08
    Druckenmiller fair value$148.73
    Druckenmiller-39.2% margin vs $207.08
    Spier fair value$115.95
    Spier-78.6% margin vs $207.08
    Show 8 more metrics
    Pabrai fair value$70.17
    Pabrai-195.1% margin vs $207.08
    Munger fair value$148.73
    Munger-39.2% margin vs $207.08
    Ackman fair value$155.78
    Ackman-32.9% margin vs $207.08
    Piotroski fair value$6.89
    Piotroski-2905.5% margin vs $207.08
    Greenblatt fair value$56.76
    Greenblatt-264.8% margin vs $207.08
    Lynch fair value$91.92
    Lynch-125.3% margin vs $207.08
    Buffett fair value$160.90
    Buffett-28.7% margin vs $207.08
    Graham fair value$31.38
    Graham-559.9% margin vs $207.08

Where They Disagree

  • Profitability

    5 of 11 pass — Marks, Druckenmiller, Spier +3 more object

    Discount to Intrinsic Value-23.0% (IV=$83.25 vs Price=$102.39)
    Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency28/28 years positive
    MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Return on Equity98.2% (3-yr avg)
    AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    EPS Growth AccelerationLatest: 12.0%, Prior: 22.5%
    DruckenmillerAccelerating EPS growth
    Show 19 more metrics
    Margin of SafetyP/E=16.1x, P/B=14.9x
    SpierP/E < 15 AND P/B < 2.0PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Operating Income / Revenue26.8%
    Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity94.4%
    Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Total Assets11.88%
    PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY10.96% -> 11.88% (delta: +0.92%)
    PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=19.24%, ROA=11.88%
    PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY78.1% -> 78.5%
    PiotroskiImproved YoY
    EBIT / Enterprise Value8.2%
    Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=8.2%, ROC=604.3%
    GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.5%
    Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE94.4%
    Lynch> 15%
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)28/28 years positive
    BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (5-yr avg)103.3%
    Buffett> 15% (5-yr avg)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)26.8% (latest)
    BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.3B
    BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.99
    BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness0.04x
    Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Positive EPS (10 years)28/28 years positive
    GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)3519.6%
    Graham>= 33% growth
  • Debt & Leverage

    1 of 8 pass — Akre, Munger, Ackman +4 more object

    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=15.4x, D/EBITDA=1.3x
    MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Debt Levels1.84
    AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1.84
    Ackman<= 1.0
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change22.96% -> 23.15%
    PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    Show 4 more metrics
    Total Debt / Equity1.84
    Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-417.0M
    LynchPositive preferred
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.84, IC: 15.4x
    BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $2.5B vs NCA $1.8B
    GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
  • Valuation

    3 of 9 pass — Marks, Spier, Pabrai +3 more object

    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=16.1x, P/B=14.9x
    MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-23.0% (IV=$83.25 vs Price=$102.39)
    Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Price vs. 200-day MAQualitative
    DruckenmillerPrice above 200-day moving average
    Margin of SafetyP/E=16.1x, P/B=14.9x
    SpierP/E < 15 AND P/B < 2.0
    Show 9 more metrics
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=16.1x, FCF Yield=9.3%
    PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=16.1x, OE Yield=6.3%
    MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    Price / FCF per Share10.7x
    Ackman<= 25
    EBIT / Enterprise Value8.2%
    Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=8.2%, ROC=604.3%
    GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    P/E / EPS Growth Rate1.11
    Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS18.4x
    Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio14.9x
    Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B274.00
    Graham<= 22.5
  • Cash Flow

    5 of 6 pass — Pabrai objects

    FCF Positive20/20 years FCF positive
    MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=16.1x, FCF Yield=9.3%
    PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap9.3%
    Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share10.7x
    Ackman<= 25
    Show 4 more metrics
    Operating Cash Flow$2.1B
    PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=19.24%, ROA=11.88%
    PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    FCF Positive and Growing$1.9B
    LynchPositive and growing
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$1.3B
    BuffettPositive and growing
  • Growth

    2 of 5 pass — Druckenmiller, Ackman and Lynch object

    Positive Net Income Frequency28/28 years positive
    MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    EPS Growth AccelerationLatest: 12.0%, Prior: 22.5%
    DruckenmillerAccelerating EPS growth
    Revenue Growth RateLatest: 5.6%, Prior: 4.4%
    DruckenmillerRevenue growth accelerating
    3yr Median Revenue Growth4.4%
    Ackman>= 5%
    Show 5 more metrics
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency4/5 years with positive EPS growth
    AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    P/E / EPS Growth Rate1.11
    Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR14.5%
    Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 6.5% vs Rev: 5.6%
    LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)3519.6%
    Graham>= 33% growth
  • Efficiency

    5 of 6 pass — Graham objects

    ROIC (high and growing)9/21 years ROIC > 15% (latest: 34.5%)
    AkreROIC > 15% for 3+ years
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC23.3% (RR=68% x ROIC=34.5%)
    AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    Return on Invested Capital34.5%
    Munger> 15%
    Current Ratio Change YoY1.26 -> 1.44
    PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Show 5 more metrics
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.55x -> 0.58x
    PiotroskiImproved YoY
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)604.3%
    Greenblatt> 25%
    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)73.9%
    Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+63.9%
    BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    Current Ratio1.44
    Graham>= 2.0
  • Verdicts

    Split decision: 5 HOLD · 3 BUY · 2 PASS · 1 FAIL

    Overall verdict
    MarksHOLD (6/8)AkreHOLD (5/7)DruckenmillerHOLD (5/7)SpierBUY (7/8)PabraiHOLD (6/8)MungerBUY (6/7)AckmanHOLD (7/9)PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)GreenblattNot rankedLynchPASS (PEG 1.11)BuffettPASS (5/9)GrahamFAIL (3/9)

Historical Score Timeline

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Computers

NTAP vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$6.2BBottom 25%
Net Income$1.3BBottom 25%
ROE94.4%Top 25%
D/E1.84Bottom 25%
Op. Margin26.8%Median
Curr. Ratio1.44Top 25%
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroski
Apple Inc.AAPL$4.46T$305.93$416.2B$112.0B151.9%1.4032.0%0.891/96/93/71/3F-Score 8
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.CSCO$440.2B$111.68$56.7B$10.2B21.7%0.5620.8%1.004/97/93/70/3F-Score 8
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPIBM$220.8B$234.32$67.5B$10.6B32.4%1.680.963/93/93/70/3F-Score 6
Hewlett Packard Enterprise CoHPE-PC$198.1B$150.26$34.3B$57.0M0.2%1.03-1.3%1.011/91/91/70/3F-Score 4
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPWDC$175.4B$508.80$9.5B$1.9B35.6%1.3124.5%1.081/91/93/71/3F-Score 4
NCR Voyix CorpNCRRP$138.6B$1002.00$2.7B$62.0M6.5%1.171.0%1.041/93/90/70/3F-Score 3
Fortinet, Inc.FTNT$117.4B$160.01$6.8B$1.9B149.8%0.8130.7%1.172/95/95/71/3F-Score 6
HP INCHPQ$27.5B$30.11$55.3B$2.5B-730.9%-30.385.7%0.773/93/91/71/3F-Score 5