CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

CSCO
About the company

Cisco Systems, Inc. designs, develops, and sells technologies that help to power, secure, and draw insights from the internet in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Japan, and China.

Country: United StatesPrice: $106.74Market Cap: $420.8B

Investment snapshot

19%positive consensus
Scored 37d ago

Positive

3

BUY / PASS

Neutral / negative

4 / 8

NEUTRAL / FAIL

Median fair value

$39.27

-63.2% vs price

Models with upside

0 / 16

Positive margin of safety

Strongest signal

6 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object

Key risk

No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

Framework analysis

VerdictMeaning
BUYPositive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met.
PASSThe company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state.
NEUTRALNeither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position.
FAILThe company does not clear the framework's requirements.
RankedRanked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL.
Scored from 10-K37d ago
MetricO'Shaughnessy

Systematic Factor Composite

Lynch

GARP

Buffett

Quality Compounder

Pabrai

Dhandho Framework

Akre

Three-Legged Stool

Schloss

Asset-Value Discipline

Neff

Low-P/E Total Return

Sleep

Scale Economies Shared

Templeton

Global Bargain Hunter

Marks

Risk-Aware Value

Munger

Quality Focus

Ackman

Activist Value

Dreman

Contrarian Value

Piotroski

F-Score

Greenblatt

Magic Formula

Graham

Defensive Value

VerdictFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILNEUTRALFAILNEUTRALFAILFAILFAILNEUTRALPASSBUYNot rankedPASS
Score
Analysis
Intrinsic ValueN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Margin of SafetyN/AN/A-149.5%-376.9%-90.8%N/AN/AN/A-163.9%-212.7%-180.1%-82.2%-161.6%N/A-311.2%-309.4%
Data As Of10-K (2026-08-25)10-K (2026-08-25)10-K (2026-08-25)10-K (2026-08-25)10-K (2026-08-25)10-K (2026-08-24)10-K (2026-08-24)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)10-K (2026-08-23)

Where It Passes

  • Cash Flow60% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾

    6 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object

    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.16%; #1912/4487 (top 42.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    FCF Positive and Growing$13.3B
    ✓LynchPositive and growing
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$10.1B
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=41.9x, FCF Yield=3.2%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$13.3B
    ✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)
    Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency18/18 years positive
    ✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years
    FCF Positive18/18 years FCF positive
    ✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years
    (OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap3.1%
    ✗Ackman>= 4%
    Price / FCF per Share31.8x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price / (CFO / Shares)29.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    Operating Cash Flow$14.2B
    ✓PiotroskiCFO > 0
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.61%, ROA=8.32%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA

Where It Falls Short

  • Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 25▾

    No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one valuation criterion

    Revenue / market capitalization+0.1346; #4004/5203 (top 77.0%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Net income / market capitalization+2.42%; #2418/6251 (top 38.7%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    (Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.16%; #1912/4487 (top 42.6%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Trailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+37.57%; #976/6203 (top 15.7%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 41.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    P/E or FCF YieldP/E=41.9x, FCF Yield=3.2%
    ✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%
    Price / Book Value per Share9.01x
    ✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2x
    Price / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)
    ✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)
    Book Value per Share Change+32.3%
    ✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)
    Price / Diluted EPS41.9x
    ✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)
    (EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.02
    ✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)
    Price / EPS41.9x
    ✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12x
    Price vs. Trailing Low185% of trailing low ($57.73)
    ✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)
    P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=41.9x, P/B=9.0x
    ✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-161.6% (IV=$40.80 vs Price=$106.74)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=41.9x, OE Yield=2.4%
    ✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%
    Price / FCF per Share31.8x
    ✗Ackman<= 25
    Price / (CFO / Shares)29.7x
    ✗Dreman< 8x
    EBIT / Enterprise Value2.7%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.7%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Price / 3-yr avg EPS39.2x
    ✗Graham<= 15x
    Price-to-Book Ratio9.0x
    ✗Graham<= 1.5x
    P/E x P/B353.50
    ✗Graham<= 22.5
  • Valuation models0% pass✗ 10▾

    CSCO overvalued: all 10 models price fair value below $106.74 (median $39.27)

    Buffett fair value$42.78
    ✗Buffett-149.5% margin vs $106.74
    Pabrai fair value$22.38
    ✗Pabrai-376.9% margin vs $106.74
    Akre fair value$55.93
    ✗Akre-90.8% margin vs $106.74
    Templeton fair value$40.44
    ✗Templeton-163.9% margin vs $106.74
    Marks fair value$34.14
    ✗Marks-212.7% margin vs $106.74
    Munger fair value$38.11
    ✗Munger-180.1% margin vs $106.74
    Ackman fair value$58.60
    ✗Ackman-82.2% margin vs $106.74
    Dreman fair value$40.80
    ✗Dreman-161.6% margin vs $106.74
    Greenblatt fair value$25.96
    ✗Greenblatt-311.2% margin vs $106.74
    Graham fair value$26.07
    ✗Graham-309.4% margin vs $106.74
  • Debt & Leverage27% pass✓ 5✗ 9▾

    8 of 11 flag CSCO's debt & leverage — Lynch, Buffett, Akre +5 more

    Total Debt / Equity0.60
    ✗Lynch< 0.33
    Cash - Long-term Debt$-14.5B
    ✗LynchPositive preferred
    Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.60, IC: 7.8x
    ✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5x
    Debt Levels0.60
    ✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5
    Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.60x
    ✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓Dreman< 0.8
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.00x
    ✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)✗Dreman> 1.5
    Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=7.8x, D/EBITDA=2.3x
    ✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4x
    Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.60
    ✓Ackman<= 1.0
    LT Debt / Total Assets Change15.77% -> 18.69%
    ✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
    LT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $22.9B vs NCA $-78.0M
    ✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets
  • Verdicts27% pass✓ 3✗ 8▾

    Split decision: 8 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS · 1 BUY

    Overall verdict
    ✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #529/953 (Top 55.5%))✗LynchFAIL (3/7)•BuffettNEUTRAL (6/9)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•AckmanNEUTRAL (7/9)✓DremanPASS (5/11)✓PiotroskiBUY (F-Score 8)•GreenblattNot ranked✓GrahamPASS (4/9)
  • Growth38% pass✓ 6✗ 7▾

    5 of 8 flag CSCO's growth — Lynch, Neff, Sleep +2 more

    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 41.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR-0.7%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    Inventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -6.2% vs Rev: 5.3%
    ✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-0.7% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 62.7% -> 64.9%, operating margin 26.4% -> 20.8%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-year Revenue CAGR2.8%
    ✗SleepCAGR > 7%
    5-Year EPS CAGR-0.7% CAGR over 5 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Positive Net Income Frequency18/18 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    3yr Median Revenue Growth5.3%
    ✓Ackman>= 5%
    Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth
    ✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 years
    EPS Growth Direction$1.31 (2008) -> $2.55 (2025)
    ✓DremanPositive over recent years
    EPS CAGR4.0% CAGR over 17 years
    ✗Dreman> 5% annualized
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)121.1%
    ✓Graham>= 33% growth
  • Efficiency38% pass✓ 5✗ 6▾

    5 of 8 flag CSCO's efficiency — Akre, Munger, Dreman +2 more

    ROIC (3-5 yr avg)21.0%
    ✓Buffett> 10%
    ROIC - WACC+11.0%
    ✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)
    ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=22.5%; FY2024: ROIC=12.6%; FY2025: ROIC=12.4%
    ✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in each
    Reinvestment Rate x ROIC4.6% (RR=37% x ROIC=12.4%)
    ✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%
    ROIC (5-year)5/5 years above 12% (latest 12.4%)
    ✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of years
    Return on Invested Capital12.4%
    ✗Munger> 15%
    Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.00
    ✗Dreman> 1.5
    Current Ratio Change YoY0.91 -> 1.00
    ✓PiotroskiIncreased YoY
    Revenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.43x -> 0.46x
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)
    ✗Greenblatt> 25%
    Current Ratio1.00
    ✗Graham>= 2.0
  • Profitability40% pass✓ 18✗ 13▾

    9 of 15 flag CSCO's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Buffett +6 more

    Net income / market capitalization+2.42%; #2418/6251 (top 38.7%)
    ✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section
    Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 41.9x (growth N/A)
    ✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)
    3-5 Year EPS CAGR-0.7%
    ✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to pass
    ROE21.7%
    ✓Lynch> 15%
    Net Income Positive (10+ years)18/18 years positive
    ✓BuffettPositive every year for 10+ years
    ROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)25.6%
    ✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)
    Operating Margin (10-yr trend)20.8% (latest)
    ✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 years
    Free Cash Flow Proxy$10.1B
    ✓BuffettPositive and growing
    Earnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.40
    ✗BuffettCoV < 0.3
    Retained Earnings Effectiveness
    ✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value created
    Margin of SafetyP/E=41.9x, P/B=9.0x
    ✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15
    Return on Equity24.3% (3-yr avg)
    ✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)
    Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive
    ✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)
    3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-0.7% over 5 years
    ✗Neff7%-20% annualized
    Revenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 62.7% -> 64.9%, operating margin 26.4% -> 20.8%
    ✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding
    5-Year EPS CAGR-0.7% CAGR over 5 years
    ✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)
    Operating Margin Trend26.4% (2023) -> 20.8% (2025)
    ✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 years
    Discount to Intrinsic Value-161.6% (IV=$40.80 vs Price=$106.74)
    ✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic value
    Positive Net Income Frequency18/18 years positive
    ✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years
    Operating Income / Revenue20.8%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Net Income / Shareholders Equity21.7%
    ✓Ackman>= 15%
    Pre-Tax Income / Revenue19.6%
    ✓Dreman>= 8%
    Net Income / Shareholders' Equity21.7%
    ✓Dreman> 12%
    Net Income / Total Assets8.32%
    ✓PiotroskiROA > 0
    ROA Change YoY8.29% -> 8.32% (delta: +0.03%)
    ✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA
    (CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.61%, ROA=8.32%
    ✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
    Gross Margin Change YoY64.7% -> 64.9%
    ✓PiotroskiImproved YoY
    EBIT / Enterprise Value2.7%
    ✗Greenblatt> 10%
    Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.7%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)
    ✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%
    Positive EPS (10 years)18/18 years positive
    ✓GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 years
    EPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)121.1%
    ✓Graham>= 33% growth

Business & financials

Company Profile

Industry: Computers
SIC Sector: Industrial Machinery & Computing
Size: Mega Cap($420.8B)
Revenue: $56.7B+5.3% YoY
Net Income: $10.2B-1.4% YoY

Financial Snapshot

Operating Margin20.8%
Return on Equity21.7%
Debt / Equity0.60
Current Ratio1.00
EPS (Diluted)$2.55+0.4% 1y
Buybacks (1y)$6.0B
Buybacks (2y)$11.8B
Shares Retired0.9% / 2.5% 2y

Similar Companies

AAPLApple Inc.
$4.81T
PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc
$317.7B
STXSeagate Technology Holdings plc
$209.0B
IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
$207.3B

Shareholder Return

Fiscal 2025

Retired 0.9% of shares last year, 2.5% over two.

Buybacks
$6.0B
Dividends
$6.4B

What drove EPS

A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.

FY22
12.8% = 11.5% + 1.1%
FY23
8.9% = 6.8% + 2.0%
FY24
−17.3% = −18.2% + 1.1%
FY25
0.4% = −1.4% + 1.8%
Earnings Fewer shares More shares

Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.

Company Financials

Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years

MetricFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021
Market Cap$420.8B$233.2Best.$190.1Best.$181.2Best.$206.3Best.
Revenue$56.7B↑5%$53.8B↓6%$57.0B↑11%$51.6B↑3%$49.8B
Operating Income$11.8B↓3%$12.2B↓19%$15.0B↑8%$14.0B↑9%$12.8B
Net Income$10.2B↓1%$10.3B↓18%$12.6B↑7%$11.8B↑12%$10.6B
EPS (Diluted)$2.55$2.54↓17%$3.07↑9%$2.82↑13%$2.50
Gross Margin64.9%64.7%↑3%62.7%62.5%↓2%64.0%
Operating Margin20.8%↓8%22.6%↓14%26.4%↓3%27.1%↑5%25.8%
ROE21.7%↓4%22.7%↓20%28.4%↓4%29.7%↑16%25.7%
Total Debt$28.1B↓9%$31.0B↑269%$8.4B↓12%$9.5B↓17%$11.5B
Shareholders' Equity$46.8B↑3%$45.5B↑2%$44.4B↑12%$39.8B↓4%$41.3B
Current Ratio1.00↑10%0.91↓34%1.38↓3%1.43↓4%1.49
Debt / Equity0.60↓12%0.68↑260%0.19↓21%0.24↓14%0.28
Operating Cash Flow$14.2B↑30%$10.9B↓45%$19.9B↑50%$13.2B↓14%$15.5B
Free Cash Flow$13.3B↑30%$10.2B↓46%$19.0B↑49%$12.7B↓14%$14.8B

Score history

Historical Score Timeline

Industry peers

Industry Peers

Similar companies in Computers

CSCO vs Peers — Financial Grading

Revenue$56.7BTop 25%
Net Income$10.2BTop 25%
ROE21.7%Bottom 25%
D/E0.60Top 25%
Op. Margin20.8%Median
Curr. Ratio1.00Median
CompanyMarket CapPriceRevenueNet IncomeROED/EOp. MarginCurr. RatioGrahamBuffettLynchGreenblattPiotroskiDreman
Apple Inc.AAPL$4.81T$329.40$416.2B$112.0B151.9%1.2332.0%0.891/95/93/71/3F-Score 83/11
Palo Alto Networks IncPANW$317.7B$388.41$9.2B$1.1B14.5%0.0013.5%0.941/93/93/70/3F-Score 54/11
Seagate Technology Holdings plcSTX$209.0B$921.51$12.2B$3.2B146.9%1.6533.6%1.673/95/94/71/3F-Score 86/11
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPIBM$207.3B$219.99$67.5B$10.6B32.4%1.88—0.963/92/93/70/3F-Score 64/11
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPWDC$163.5B$453.48$9.5B$1.9B35.6%1.3124.5%1.081/91/92/71/3F-Score 33/11
Fortinet, Inc.FTNT$130.2B$175.96$6.8B$1.9B149.8%0.8130.7%1.172/95/93/71/3F-Score 63/11
Hewlett Packard Enterprise CoHPE$81.6B$61.49$34.3B$57.0M0.2%0.91-1.3%1.011/90/91/70/3F-Score 42/11
NetApp, Inc.NTAP$41.1B$209.18$6.2B$1.3B94.4%1.8426.8%1.443/95/93/71/3F-Score 85/11