INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
IBMAbout the company
International Business Machines Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides integrated solutions and services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through Software, Consulting, Infrastructure, and Financing segments. The Software segment offers hybrid cloud and AI platforms that allow clients to realize their digital and AI transformations across the applications, data, and environments in which they operate.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
4 / 9
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$128.70
-41.5% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 16
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
All 8 investors flag IBM's efficiency
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
| Metric | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite | Munger Quality Focus | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Ackman Activist Value | Dreman Contrarian Value | Piotroski F-Score | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Graham Defensive Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | NEUTRAL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | NEUTRAL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | Not ranked | FAIL |
| Score | ||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Intrinsic Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -58.4% | -86.3% | N/A | -59.0% | N/A | +41.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | -116.4% | -22.8% | -70.9% | N/A | -160.5% | -135.2% |
| Data As Of | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Efficiency0% pass✗ 11▾
All 8 investors flag IBM's efficiency
Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (3-5 yr avg)✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of yearsCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities0.96✗Dreman> 1.5Current Ratio Change YoY1.04 -> 0.96✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.46x -> 0.44x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio0.96✗Graham>= 2.0 - Debt & Leverage9% pass✓ 1✗ 13▾
10 of 11 flag IBM's debt & leverage — Munger, Marks, Buffett +7 more
Debt Levels1.88✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=6.3x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 1.88, IC: 6.3x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity1.88✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-41.2B✗LynchPositive preferredTotal Debt / Shareholders' Equity1.88x✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗Dreman< 0.8Current Assets / Current Liabilities0.96x✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)✗Dreman> 1.5Total Debt / Shareholders Equity1.88✗Ackman<= 1.0LT Debt / Total Assets Change36.37% -> 36.10%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYLT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $54.8B vs NCA $-1.7B✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets - Valuation models11% pass✓ 1✗ 8▾
Models split on IBM at $219.99 — fair values range $84.46–$375.13
Munger fair value$138.91✗Munger-58.4% margin vs $219.99Marks fair value$118.08✗Marks-86.3% margin vs $219.99Lynch fair value$138.35✗Lynch-59.0% margin vs $219.99Akre fair value$375.13✓Akre+41.4% margin vs $219.99Templeton fair value$101.67✗Templeton-116.4% margin vs $219.99Ackman fair value$179.08✗Ackman-22.8% margin vs $219.99Dreman fair value$128.70✗Dreman-70.9% margin vs $219.99Greenblatt fair value$84.46✗Greenblatt-160.5% margin vs $219.99Graham fair value$93.55✗Graham-135.2% margin vs $219.99 - Valuation17% pass✓ 5✗ 21▾
10 of 12 flag IBM's valuation — Oshaughnessy, Marks, Lynch +7 more
Revenue / market capitalization+0.3258; #3061/5203 (top 58.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / market capitalization+5.11%; #1551/6251 (top 24.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.84%; #1291/4487 (top 28.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date-9.24%; #3851/6203 (top 62.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionValuation ReasonablenessP/E=19.7x✓MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=19.7x, P/B=6.3x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-70.9% (IV=$128.70 vs Price=$219.99)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valueBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.59✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)P/E or FCF YieldP/E=19.7x, FCF Yield=5.8%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Price / Book Value per Share6.32x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2xPrice / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+51.0%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Price / Diluted EPS19.7x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E0.78✓Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / EPS19.7x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12xPrice vs. Trailing Low100% of trailing low ($219.99)✓Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Price / FCF per Share17.0x✓Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)15.6x✗Dreman< 8xEBIT / Enterprise Value4.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=4.8%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / 3-yr avg EPS25.6x✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio6.3x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B162.00✗Graham<= 22.5 - Verdicts18% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
Split decision: 9 FAIL · 4 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS
Overall verdict•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✓MungerPASS (2/4)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗LynchFAIL (3/7)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (3/7)•NeffNEUTRAL (5/6)✗SleepFAIL (2/6)✓TempletonPASS (4/8)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)•GreenblattNot ranked✗GrahamFAIL (3/9) - Profitability33% pass✓ 17✗ 14▾
10 of 15 flag IBM's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Marks, Buffett +7 more
Net income / market capitalization+5.11%; #1551/6251 (top 24.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionDiscount to Intrinsic Value-70.9% (IV=$128.70 vs Price=$219.99)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency18/18 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsNet Income Positive (10+ years)18/18 years positive✓BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)25.1%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.34✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.59✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR12.4%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE32.4%✓Lynch> 15%Margin of SafetyP/E=19.7x, P/B=6.3x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity29.3% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR12.4% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-Year EPS CAGR12.4% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsOperating Income / Revenue✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity32.4%✓Ackman>= 15%Pre-Tax Income / Revenue15.3%✓Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity32.4%✓Dreman> 12%Net Income / Total Assets6.97%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY4.39% -> 6.97% (delta: +2.58%)✓PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.69%, ROA=6.97%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY56.7% -> 58.2%✓PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / Enterprise Value4.8%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=4.8%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Positive EPS (10 years)18/18 years positive✓GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-15.4%✗Graham>= 33% growth - Growth38% pass✓ 7✗ 6▾
5 of 8 flag IBM's growth — Lynch, Sleep, Ackman +2 more
Positive Net Income Frequency18/18 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)1.59✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR12.4%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: -5.4% vs Rev: 7.6%✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR12.4% over 5 years✓Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trend✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR4.1%✗SleepCAGR > 7%5-Year EPS CAGR12.4% CAGR over 5 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)3yr Median Revenue Growth2.2%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 yearsEPS Growth Direction$8.89 (2008) -> $11.17 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR1.4% CAGR over 17 years✗Dreman> 5% annualizedEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)-15.4%✗Graham>= 33% growth - Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
5 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Buffett, Lynch +2 more object
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+5.84%; #1291/4487 (top 28.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionFCF Positive18/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$12.1B✗LynchPositive and growingP/E or FCF YieldP/E=19.7x, FCF Yield=5.8%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$12.1B✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency18/18 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap5.9%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share17.0x✓Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)15.6x✗Dreman< 8xOperating Cash Flow$13.2B✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=8.69%, ROA=6.97%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Business & financials
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Issued 1.2% of shares last year, 2.4% issued over two.
- Buybacks
- —
- Dividends
- $6.3B
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years
| Metric | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $207.3B | $229.7Best. | $157.4Best. | $108.9Best. | $101.9Best. |
| Revenue | $67.5B↑8% | $62.8B↑1% | $61.9B↑2% | $60.5B↑6% | $57.4B |
| Operating Income | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Net Income | $10.6B↑76% | $6.0B↓20% | $7.5B↑358% | $1.6B↓71% | $5.7B |
| EPS (Diluted) | $11.17↑74% | $6.43↓21% | $8.14↑352% | $1.80↓72% | $6.35 |
| Gross Margin | 58.2%↑3% | 56.7%↑2% | 55.4%↑3% | 54.0%↓2% | 54.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROE | 32.4%↑47% | 22.1%↓34% | 33.3%↑346% | 7.5%↓75% | 30.4% |
| Total Debt | $61.3B↑11% | $54.9B↓3% | $56.5B↑11% | $50.9B↓1% | $51.7B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $32.6B↑20% | $27.3B↑21% | $22.5B↑3% | $21.9B↑16% | $18.9B |
| Current Ratio | 0.96↓8% | 1.04↑8% | 0.96↑4% | 0.92↑5% | 0.88 |
| Debt / Equity | 1.88↓7% | 2.01↓20% | 2.51↑8% | 2.32↓15% | 2.73 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $13.2B↓2% | $13.4B↓3% | $13.9B↑34% | $10.4B↓18% | $12.8B |
| Free Cash Flow | $12.1B↓2% | $12.4B↓2% | $12.7B↑40% | $9.1B↓15% | $10.7B |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Computers
IBM vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc.AAPL | $4.81T | $329.40 | $416.2B | $112.0B | 151.9% | 1.23 | 32.0% | 0.89 | 1/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 3/11 |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.CSCO | $420.8B | $106.74 | $56.7B | $10.2B | 21.7% | 0.60 | 20.8% | 1.00 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |
| Palo Alto Networks IncPANW | $317.7B | $388.41 | $9.2B | $1.1B | 14.5% | 0.00 | 13.5% | 0.94 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plcSTX | $209.0B | $921.51 | $12.2B | $3.2B | 146.9% | 1.65 | 33.6% | 1.67 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 6/11 |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPWDC | $163.5B | $453.48 | $9.5B | $1.9B | 35.6% | 1.31 | 24.5% | 1.08 | 1/9 | 1/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 3 | 3/11 |
| Fortinet, Inc.FTNT | $130.2B | $175.96 | $6.8B | $1.9B | 149.8% | 0.81 | 30.7% | 1.17 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 3/11 |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise CoHPE | $81.6B | $61.49 | $34.3B | $57.0M | 0.2% | 0.91 | -1.3% | 1.01 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 2/11 |
| NetApp, Inc.NTAP | $41.1B | $209.18 | $6.2B | $1.3B | 94.4% | 1.84 | 26.8% | 1.44 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 8 | 5/11 |