HUMANA INC
HUMAbout the company
Humana Inc. provides medical and specialty insurance products in the United States. It operates in two segments, Insurance and CenterWell.
Investment snapshot
Positive
4
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 9
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$180.05
-53.5% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 15
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
No clean pass — all 11 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
| Metric | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Munger Quality Focus | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Ackman Activist Value | Dreman Contrarian Value | Piotroski F-Score | Graham Defensive Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | PASS | PASS | PASS |
| Score | |||||||||||||||
| Analysis | |||||||||||||||
| Intrinsic Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -152.9% | N/A | -457.2% | +44.9% | -705.0% | -58.2% | N/A | N/A | N/A | -52.5% | -377.7% | -94.3% | N/A | -114.9% |
| Data As Of | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 2✗ 22▾
No clean pass — all 11 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Revenue / market capitalization+2.7911; #775/5203 (top 14.9%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / market capitalization+2.56%; #2380/6251 (top 38.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.81%; #2407/4487 (top 53.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+123.12%; #280/6203 (top 4.5%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 39.3x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)P/E or FCF YieldP/E=39.3x, FCF Yield=0.8%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Valuation ReasonablenessP/E=39.3x, OE Yield=2.9%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=39.3x, P/B=2.6x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-94.3% (IV=$199.10 vs Price=$386.87)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePrice / Book Value per Share2.64x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2xPrice / Tangible Book Value per Share6.82x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+37.4%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Price / Diluted EPS39.3x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E-0.41✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / EPS39.3x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12xPrice vs. Trailing Low223% of trailing low ($173.39)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Price / FCF per Share124.4x✗Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)50.7x✗Dreman< 8xPrice / 3-yr avg EPS29.1x✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio2.6x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B77.00✗Graham<= 22.5 - Profitability7% pass✓ 6✗ 22▾
13 of 14 flag HUM's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Buffett, Lynch +10 more
Net income / market capitalization+2.56%; #2380/6251 (top 38.1%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet Income Positive (10+ years)27/28 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)13.2%✗Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)2.1% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$1.3B✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.83✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 39.3x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-17.2%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE6.7%✗Lynch> 15%Margin of SafetyP/E=39.3x, P/B=2.6x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity9.8% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Discount to Intrinsic Value-94.3% (IV=$199.10 vs Price=$386.87)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency27/27 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsPositive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-17.2% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 3.8% -> 2.1%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-Year EPS CAGR-17.2% CAGR over 5 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend3.8% (2023) -> 2.1% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsOperating Income / Revenue2.1%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity6.7%✗Ackman>= 15%Pre-Tax Income / Revenue1.1%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity6.7%✗Dreman> 12%Net Income / Total Assets2.43%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY2.60% -> 2.43% (delta: -0.17%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=1.88%, ROA=2.43%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAPositive EPS (10 years)26/28 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)2358.0%✓Graham>= 33% growth - Valuation models11% pass✓ 1✗ 8▾
Models split on HUM at $386.87 — fair values range $48.06–$702.02
Buffett fair value$153.00✗Buffett-152.9% margin vs $386.87Pabrai fair value$69.43✗Pabrai-457.2% margin vs $386.87Akre fair value$702.02✓Akre+44.9% margin vs $386.87Munger fair value$48.06✗Munger-705.0% margin vs $386.87Marks fair value$244.53✗Marks-58.2% margin vs $386.87Templeton fair value$253.71✗Templeton-52.5% margin vs $386.87Ackman fair value$80.99✗Ackman-377.7% margin vs $386.87Dreman fair value$199.10✗Dreman-94.3% margin vs $386.87Graham fair value$180.05✗Graham-114.9% margin vs $386.87 - Efficiency25% pass✓ 1✗ 4▾
3 of 4 flag HUM's efficiency — Akre, Munger and Sleep
ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=11.4%; FY2024: ROIC=7.2%; FY2025: ROIC=7.1%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC4.5% (RR=64% x ROIC=7.1%)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%Return on Invested Capital7.1%✗Munger> 15%ROIC (5-year)0/5 years above 12% (latest 7.1%)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of yearsRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY2.53x -> 2.65x✓PiotroskiImproved YoY - Verdicts31% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾
Split decision: 9 FAIL · 4 PASS · 2 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict✗OshaughnessyFAIL (Rank #350/953 (Top 36.7%))✗BuffettFAIL (2/7)✗LynchFAIL (0/6)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗MarksFAIL (3/5)•SchlossNEUTRAL (5/7)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✓DremanPASS (4/10)✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 4)✓GrahamPASS (3/7) - Growth38% pass✓ 6✗ 6▾
5 of 8 flag HUM's growth — Lynch, Neff, Sleep +2 more
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 39.3x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-17.2%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passPositive Net Income Frequency27/27 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-17.2% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendrevenue up, operating margin 3.8% -> 2.1%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR10.9%✓SleepCAGR > 7%5-Year EPS CAGR-17.2% CAGR over 5 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)3yr Median Revenue Growth10.7%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency0/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 yearsEPS Growth Direction$0.54 (2000) -> $9.84 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR12.3% CAGR over 25 years✓Dreman> 5% annualizedEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)2358.0%✓Graham>= 33% growth - Cash Flow40% pass✓ 5✗ 7▾
6 of 10 flag HUM's cash flow — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Pabrai +3 more
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+0.81%; #2407/4487 (top 53.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionFree Cash Flow Proxy$1.3B✓BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$375.0M✗LynchPositive and growingP/E or FCF YieldP/E=39.3x, FCF Yield=0.8%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%FCF Positive18/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent yearsOperating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$375.0M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency28/28 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap0.8%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share124.4x✗Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)50.7x✗Dreman< 8xOperating Cash Flow$921.0M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=1.88%, ROA=2.43%✗PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA - Debt & Leverage50% pass✓ 6✗ 6▾
5 of 10 pass — Buffett, Lynch, Akre +2 more object
Debt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.70, IC: 4.3x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity0.70✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-8.2B✗LynchPositive preferredDebt Levels0.70✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=4.3x, D/EBITDA=3.6x✓MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.70x✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✓Dreman< 0.8Current Assets / Current Liabilities2.00x✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)Total Debt / Shareholders Equity0.70✓Ackman<= 1.0LT Debt / Total Assets Change23.98% -> 25.29%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoY
Business & financials
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Insurers file unclassified balance sheets with no inventory or current accounts, so those criteria are omitted rather than failed for missing data. Return-on-invested-capital tests are omitted too: float funds the balance sheet but never appears in invested capital, and the portfolio it is invested in would be subtracted as spare cash. Debt tests are kept — an insurer’s borrowings are real leverage on top of underwriting.
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 0.0% of shares last year, 0.7% over two.
- Buybacks
- $151.0M
- Dividends
- $430.0M
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years
| Metric | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $46.5B | $34.7Best. | $44.5Best. | $61.6Best. | $48.0Best. |
| Revenue | $129.7B↑10% | $117.8B↑11% | $106.4B↑15% | $92.9B↑12% | $83.1B |
| Operating Income | $2.7B↑6% | $2.6B↓36% | $4.0B↑6% | $3.8B↑21% | $3.1B |
| Net Income | $1.2B↓2% | $1.2B↓52% | $2.5B↓11% | $2.8B↓4% | $2.9B |
| EPS (Diluted) | $9.84↓1% | $9.98↓50% | $20.00↓9% | $22.08↓3% | $22.67 |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1%↓4% | 2.2%↓42% | 3.8%↓8% | 4.1%↑8% | 3.8% |
| ROE | 6.7%↓9% | 7.4%↓52% | 15.3%↓16% | 18.3% | 18.2% |
| Total Debt | $12.4B↑6% | $11.7B↑1% | $11.7B↑5% | $11.1B↓11% | $12.5B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $17.7B↑8% | $16.4B↑1% | $16.3B↑6% | $15.3B↓5% | $16.1B |
| Current Ratio | 2.00↑14% | 1.76↑11% | 1.59↑4% | 1.52↓6% | 1.62 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.70↓2% | 0.72 | 0.72↓1% | 0.73↓6% | 0.78 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $921.0M↓69% | $3.0B↓25% | $4.0B↓13% | $4.6B↑103% | $2.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | $375.0M↓84% | $2.4B↓20% | $3.0B↓14% | $3.5B↑275% | $920.0M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Insurance
HUM vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCUNH | $336.5B | $374.94 | $447.6B | $12.1B | 12.0% | 0.78 | 4.2% | 0.79 | 3/7 | 4/7 | 0/6 | F-Score 6 | 3/10 |
| PROGRESSIVE CORP/OH/PGR | $122.2B | $210.52 | $87.7B | $11.3B | 37.3% | 0.23 | — | — | 2/7 | 2/7 | 5/6 | F-Score 6 | 8/10 |
| CHINA LIFE INSURANCE CO LTDCILJF | $107.4B | $3.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3/7 | 1/7 | 3/6 | F-Score 5 | 5/10 |
| MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.MRSH | $81.3B | $170.42 | $27.0B | $4.2B | 27.2% | 1.28 | 23.1% | 1.10 | 3/7 | 3/7 | 3/6 | F-Score 6 | 5/10 |
| Aon plcAON | $58.5B | $275.90 | $17.2B | $3.7B | 39.5% | 1.63 | 25.3% | 1.11 | 2/7 | 4/7 | 3/6 | F-Score 6 | 3/10 |
| AFLAC INCAFL | $57.0B | $113.66 | $17.2B | $3.6B | 12.4% | 0.29 | — | — | 3/7 | 4/7 | 2/6 | F-Score 4 | 4/10 |
| SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INCSLF | $44.0B | $79.06 | $30.6B | $2.6B | 14.5% | 0.33 | — | — | 3/7 | 3/7 | 2/6 | F-Score 6 | 5/10 |
| HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, INC.HIG | $34.8B | $125.85 | $28.4B | $3.8B | 20.2% | 0.23 | — | — | 4/7 | 3/7 | 4/6 | F-Score 7 | 8/10 |