ROBERT HALF INC.
RHIAbout the company
Robert Half Inc. provides talent solutions and business consulting services in the United States and internationally. The company operates through three segments: Contract Talent Solutions, Permanent Placement Talent Solutions, and Protiviti. The Contract Talent Solutions segment provides contract engagement professionals in the fields of finance and accounting, technology, marketing and creative, legal and administrative, and customer support.
Investment snapshot
Positive
4
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 8
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$32.70
-11.3% vs price
Models with upside
4 / 16
Positive margin of safety
Key risk
14 of 15 flag RHI's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Marks, Buffett +11 more
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
| Metric | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite | Munger Quality Focus | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Buffett Quality Compounder | Lynch GARP | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Ackman Activist Value | Dreman Contrarian Value | Piotroski F-Score | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Graham Defensive Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | PASS | FAIL · Rank #1525 (Top 47.5%) | PASS |
| Score | ||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Intrinsic Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -35.9% | +28.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +72.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +35.4% | -69.1% | +3.6% | N/A | -81.1% | -89.8% |
| Data As Of | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) |
Where It Passes
Where It Falls Short
- Profitability7% pass✓ 8✗ 23▾
14 of 15 flag RHI's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Marks, Buffett +11 more
Net income / market capitalization+3.52%; #2038/6251 (top 32.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionDiscount to Intrinsic Value3.6% (IV=$38.25 vs Price=$36.88)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency28/28 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsNet Income Positive (10+ years)28/28 years positive✓BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)28.0%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)1.4% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)0.74✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 27.7x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-13.2%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE10.4%✗Lynch> 15%Margin of SafetyP/E=27.7x, P/B=2.9x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity18.2% (3-yr avg)✗AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Positive Diluted-EPS Years10/10 years positive✓Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-13.2% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 40.3% -> 37.2%, operating margin 7.3% -> 1.4%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-Year EPS CAGR-13.2% CAGR over 5 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend7.3% (2023) -> 1.4% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsOperating Income / Revenue1.4%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity10.4%✗Ackman>= 15%Pre-Tax Income / Revenue3.6%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity10.4%✗Dreman> 12%Net Income / Total Assets4.66%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY8.81% -> 4.66% (delta: -4.16%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.20%, ROA=4.66%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY38.8% -> 37.2%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / Enterprise Value2.3%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.3%, ROC=19.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Positive EPS (10 years)26/28 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)155.0%✓Graham>= 33% growth - Valuation8% pass✓ 3✗ 23▾
11 of 12 flag RHI's valuation — Oshaughnessy, Munger, Marks +8 more
Revenue / market capitalization+1.4247; #1285/5203 (top 24.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / market capitalization+3.52%; #2038/6251 (top 32.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+7.07%; #1068/4487 (top 23.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+45.20%; #817/6203 (top 13.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionValuation ReasonablenessP/E=27.7x✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=27.7x, P/B=2.9x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value3.6% (IV=$38.25 vs Price=$36.88)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valueBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 27.7x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)P/E or FCF YieldP/E=27.7x, FCF Yield=7.1%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Price / Book Value per Share2.92x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2xPrice / Tangible Book Value per Share3.64x✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+18.4%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Price / Diluted EPS27.7x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E-0.25✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / EPS27.7x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12xPrice vs. Trailing Low156% of trailing low ($23.59)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)Price / FCF per Share14.0x✓Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)11.7x✗Dreman< 8xEBIT / Enterprise Value2.3%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.3%, ROC=19.2%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / 3-yr avg EPS14.5x✓Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio2.9x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B42.30✗Graham<= 22.5 - Debt & Leverage9% pass✓ 3✗ 11▾
10 of 11 flag RHI's debt & leverage — Munger, Marks, Buffett +7 more
Debt Levels✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=339.8x, D/EBITDA=N/A (D&A unavailable)✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xTotal Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredTotal Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗Dreman< 0.8Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.53x✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)✓Dreman> 1.5Total Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYLT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets - Growth25% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾
6 of 8 flag RHI's growth — Lynch, Neff, Sleep +3 more
Positive Net Income Frequency28/28 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)P/E 27.7x (growth N/A)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR-13.2%✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR-13.2% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 40.3% -> 37.2%, operating margin 7.3% -> 1.4%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR1.0%✗SleepCAGR > 7%5-Year EPS CAGR-13.2% CAGR over 5 years✗Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)3yr Median Revenue Growth-9.3%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 yearsEPS Growth Direction$1.00 (2000) -> $1.33 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR1.1% CAGR over 25 years✗Dreman> 5% annualizedEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)155.0%✓Graham>= 33% growth - Verdicts31% pass✓ 4✗ 9▾
Split decision: 8 FAIL · 4 PASS · 3 NEUTRAL
Overall verdict•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✓BuffettPASS (5/9)✗LynchFAIL (1/7)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (1/6)•SchlossNEUTRAL (4/7)✗NeffFAIL (3/6)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✗DremanFAIL (4/11)✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗GreenblattRank #1525✓GrahamPASS (4/9) - Efficiency38% pass✓ 4✗ 7▾
5 of 8 flag RHI's efficiency — Munger, Akre, Piotroski +2 more
Return on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%ROIC (3-5 yr avg)60.4%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+50.4%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)1/1 years above 12% (latest 46.1%)✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of yearsCurrent Assets / Current Liabilities1.53✓Dreman> 1.5Current Ratio Change YoY1.66 -> 1.53✗PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY2.03x -> 1.88x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)19.2%✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio1.53✗Graham>= 2.0 - Cash Flow50% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
5 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Buffett, Lynch +2 more object
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+7.07%; #1068/4487 (top 23.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionFCF Positive18/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy✗BuffettPositive and growingFCF Positive and Growing$266.8M✗LynchPositive and growingP/E or FCF YieldP/E=27.7x, FCF Yield=7.1%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$266.8M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency18/18 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap7.2%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share14.0x✓Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)11.7x✗Dreman< 8xOperating Cash Flow$320.0M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=11.20%, ROA=4.66%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA - Valuation models50% pass✓ 4✗ 4▾
Models split on RHI at $36.88 — fair values range $19.43–$135.88
Munger fair value$27.14✗Munger-35.9% margin vs $36.88Marks fair value$51.32✓Marks+28.1% margin vs $36.88Akre fair value$135.88✓Akre+72.9% margin vs $36.88Templeton fair value$57.12✓Templeton+35.4% margin vs $36.88Ackman fair value$21.81✗Ackman-69.1% margin vs $36.88Dreman fair value$38.25✓Dreman+3.6% margin vs $36.88Greenblatt fair value$20.37✗Greenblatt-81.1% margin vs $36.88Graham fair value$19.43✗Graham-89.8% margin vs $36.88
Business & financials
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 1.0% of shares last year, 3.9% over two.
- Buybacks
- $92.1M
- Dividends
- $238.2M
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years
| Metric | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.8B | $6.1Best. | $7.5Best. | $7.9Best. | $10.7Best. |
| Revenue | $5.4B↓7% | $5.8B↓9% | $6.4B↓12% | $7.2B↑12% | $6.5B |
| Operating Income | $76.5M↓68% | $241.5M↓48% | $464.6M↓48% | $890.6M↑11% | $805.8M |
| Net Income | $133.0M↓47% | $251.6M↓39% | $411.1M↓38% | $657.9M↑10% | $598.6M |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.33↓45% | $2.44↓37% | $3.88↓36% | $6.03↑12% | $5.36 |
| Gross Margin | 37.2%↓4% | 38.8%↓4% | 40.3%↓6% | 42.7%↑2% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4%↓66% | 4.2%↓43% | 7.3%↓41% | 12.3%↓1% | 12.5% |
| ROE | 10.4%↓43% | 18.3%↓29% | 25.9%↓38% | 41.9%↓3% | 43.3% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | $0 |
| Shareholders' Equity | $1.3B↓7% | $1.4B↓13% | $1.6B↑1% | $1.6B↑14% | $1.4B |
| Current Ratio | 1.53↓8% | 1.66↓11% | 1.86↓1% | 1.88↑13% | 1.67 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $320.0M↓22% | $410.5M↓36% | $636.9M↓7% | $683.8M↑13% | $603.1M |
| Free Cash Flow | $266.8M↓25% | $354.2M↓40% | $591.0M↓5% | $622.6M↑10% | $566.5M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
RHI vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mastercard IncMA | $514.8B | $568.26 | $32.8B | $15.0B | 193.5% | 2.46 | 57.6% | 1.03 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 8 | 3/11 |
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $103.7B | $261.80 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| PAYCHEX INCPAYX | $35.4B | $99.31 | $6.5B | $1.8B | 47.1% | 1.22 | 38.6% | 1.26 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $23.4B | $113.80 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 2/11 |
| Grab Holdings LtdGRAB | $12.7B | $3.10 | $3.4B | $268.0M | 4.0% | 0.31 | 1.9% | 1.75 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |
| COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INCCVLT | $6.1B | $148.08 | $1.2B | $70.7M | 942.8% | — | 6.3% | 1.95 | 1/9 | 2/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INCCSGS | $2.3B | $80.04 | $1.2B | $55.9M | 19.7% | 1.90 | 9.7% | 1.44 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |