COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC
CVLTAbout the company
Commvault Systems, Inc. provides cyber resiliency solutions for enterprises to protect, secure, and recover data, applications, and identity system.
Investment snapshot
Positive
2
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
3 / 10
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$29.98
-79.8% vs price
Models with upside
1 / 16
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
6 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object
Key risk
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
| Metric | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite | Lynch GARP | Buffett Quality Compounder | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Munger Quality Focus | Ackman Activist Value | Dreman Contrarian Value | Piotroski F-Score | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Graham Defensive Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | PASS | PASS | NEUTRAL | Not ranked | FAIL |
| Score | ||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Intrinsic Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | -323.3% | -236.4% | -393.9% | -36920.0% | N/A | N/A | N/A | -613.3% | -1942.5% | -92.6% | +28.1% | -322.5% | N/A | -939.9% | -5729.9% |
| Data As Of | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) |
Where It Passes
- Cash Flow60% pass✓ 7✗ 5▾
6 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Pabrai, Ackman +1 more object
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.86%; #1739/4487 (top 38.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionFCF Positive and Growing$237.2M✓LynchPositive and growingFree Cash Flow Proxy$73.5M✓BuffettPositive and growingP/E or FCF YieldP/E=93.7x, FCF Yield=3.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$237.2M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency21/21 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsFCF Positive18/18 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap3.9%✗Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share25.8x✗Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)25.0x✗Dreman< 8xOperating Cash Flow$244.7M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=12.97%, ROA=3.75%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Where It Falls Short
- Valuation0% pass✓ 1✗ 25▾
No clean pass — all 12 investors flag at least one valuation criterion
Revenue / market capitalization+0.1929; #3694/5203 (top 71.0%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / market capitalization+1.15%; #2792/6251 (top 44.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+3.86%; #1739/4487 (top 38.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+90.11%; #406/6203 (top 6.5%)✓OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)4.23✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)P/E or FCF YieldP/E=93.7x, FCF Yield=3.9%✗PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Price / Book Value per Share815.10x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2xPrice / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change-97.9%✗SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Price / Diluted EPS93.7x✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / EPS93.7x✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12xPrice vs. Trailing Low190% of trailing low ($77.89)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/E=93.7x, P/B=815.1x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value-322.5% (IV=$35.05 vs Price=$148.08)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valueValuation ReasonablenessP/E=93.7x, OE Yield=1.2%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%Price / FCF per Share25.8x✗Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)25.0x✗Dreman< 8xEBIT / Enterprise Value1.4%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.4%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / 3-yr avg EPS63.4x✗Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio815.1x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B51,655.1✗Graham<= 22.5 - Profitability7% pass✓ 11✗ 20▾
14 of 15 flag CVLT's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Buffett +11 more
Net income / market capitalization+1.15%; #2792/6251 (top 44.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)4.23✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR22.1%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE942.8%✓Lynch> 15%Net Income Positive (10+ years)16/23 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)204.2%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)6.3% (latest)✗BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$73.5M✓BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)2.06✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdMargin of SafetyP/E=93.7x, P/B=815.1x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity342.3% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Positive Diluted-EPS Years6/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR22.1% over 4 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 81.9% -> 81.2%, operating margin 9.0% -> 6.3%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-Year EPS CAGR22.1% CAGR over 4 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend9.0% (2023) -> 6.3% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsDiscount to Intrinsic Value-322.5% (IV=$35.05 vs Price=$148.08)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency16/21 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue6.3%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity942.8%✓Ackman>= 15%Pre-Tax Income / Revenue7.8%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity942.8%✓Dreman> 12%Net Income / Total Assets3.75%✓PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY6.81% -> 3.75% (delta: -3.06%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=12.97%, ROA=3.75%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY82.0% -> 81.2%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / Enterprise Value1.4%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=1.4%, ROC=N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Positive EPS (10 years)13/23 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growth - Debt & Leverage9% pass✓ 3✗ 11▾
10 of 11 flag CVLT's debt & leverage — Lynch, Buffett, Akre +7 more
Total Debt / Equity✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt✗LynchPositive preferredDebt/Equity & Interest Coverage✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xDebt Levels✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity✗SchlossD/E < 1.00x✗Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗Dreman< 0.8Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.95x✓SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)✓Dreman> 1.5Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=111.3x, D/EBITDA=N/A✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity✗Ackman<= 1.0LT Debt / Total Assets Change0.00% -> 0.00%✓PiotroskiDecreased YoYLT Debt vs Net Current Assets✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets - Valuation models9% pass✓ 1✗ 10▾
Models split on CVLT at $148.08 — fair values range $0.40–$205.96
Lynch fair value$34.98✗Lynch-323.3% margin vs $148.08Buffett fair value$44.02✗Buffett-236.4% margin vs $148.08Pabrai fair value$29.98✗Pabrai-393.9% margin vs $148.08Akre fair value$0.40✗Akre-36920.0% margin vs $148.08Templeton fair value$20.76✗Templeton-613.3% margin vs $148.08Marks fair value$7.25✗Marks-1942.5% margin vs $148.08Munger fair value$76.87✗Munger-92.6% margin vs $148.08Ackman fair value$205.96✓Ackman+28.1% margin vs $148.08Dreman fair value$35.05✗Dreman-322.5% margin vs $148.08Greenblatt fair value$14.24✗Greenblatt-939.9% margin vs $148.08Graham fair value$2.54✗Graham-5729.9% margin vs $148.08 - Efficiency13% pass✓ 2✗ 9▾
7 of 8 flag CVLT's efficiency — Buffett, Akre, Sleep +4 more
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)✗Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC✗BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=unavailable; FY2024: ROIC=unavailable; FY2025: ROIC=unavailable✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROIC✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)✗SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of yearsReturn on Invested Capital✗Munger> 15%Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.95✓Dreman> 1.5Current Ratio Change YoY1.14 -> 1.95✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.89x -> 0.63x✗PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)N/A (invested capital <= 0)✗Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio1.95✗Graham>= 2.0 - Verdicts17% pass✓ 2✗ 10▾
Split decision: 10 FAIL · 3 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS
Overall verdict•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗LynchFAIL (4/7)✗BuffettFAIL (2/9)✗PabraiFAIL (0/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (1/7)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)•SleepNEUTRAL (4/6)✗TempletonFAIL (2/8)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)✓AckmanPASS (4/9)✓DremanPASS (5/11)•PiotroskiNEUTRAL (F-Score 6)•GreenblattNot ranked✗GrahamFAIL (1/9) - Growth38% pass✓ 8✗ 5▾
5 of 8 flag CVLT's growth — Lynch, Neff, Sleep +2 more
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)4.23✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR22.1%✓Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthN/A (no inventory)✓LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR22.1% over 4 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 81.9% -> 81.2%, operating margin 9.0% -> 6.3%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR10.3%✓SleepCAGR > 7%5-Year EPS CAGR22.1% CAGR over 4 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Positive Net Income Frequency16/21 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth18.6%✓Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency2/5 years with positive EPS growth✗AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 yearsEPS Growth Direction$0.28 (2008) -> $1.58 (2025)✓DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR10.7% CAGR over 17 years✓Dreman> 5% annualizedEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growth
Business & financials
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 6.5% of shares last year, 5.0% over two.
- Buybacks
- $446.1M
- Dividends
- —
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years
| Metric | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.1B | $7.0Best. | $4.0Best. | $2.7Best. | $3.0Best. |
| Revenue | $1.2B↑19% | $995.6M↑19% | $839.2M↑7% | $784.6M↑2% | $769.6M |
| Operating Income | $74.0M | $73.7M↓2% | $75.4M↑574% | -$15.9M↓138% | $41.6M |
| Net Income | $70.7M↓7% | $76.1M↓55% | $168.9M↑572% | -$35.8M↓206% | $33.6M |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.58↓6% | $1.68↓55% | $3.75↑569% | $-0.80↓213% | $0.71 |
| Gross Margin | 81.2%↓1% | 82.0% | 81.9%↓1% | 82.7%↓3% | 85.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3%↓16% | 7.4%↓18% | 9.0%↑543% | -2.0%↓137% | 5.4% |
| ROE | 942.8%↑3928% | 23.4%↓61% | 60.7%↑416% | -19.2%↓246% | 13.1% |
| Total Debt | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Shareholders' Equity | $7.5M↓98% | $325.1M↑17% | $278.1M↑49% | $186.1M↓27% | $255.8M |
| Current Ratio | 1.95↑71% | 1.14↓7% | 1.23↓9% | 1.34↑9% | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Cash Flow | $244.7M↑18% | $207.4M↑2% | $203.8M↑20% | $170.3M↓4% | $177.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $237.2M↑16% | $203.6M↑2% | $199.7M↑20% | $167.0M↓4% | $173.3M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Business Services
CVLT vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mastercard IncMA | $514.8B | $568.26 | $32.8B | $15.0B | 193.5% | 2.46 | 57.6% | 1.03 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 8 | 3/11 |
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INCADP | $103.7B | $261.80 | $21.9B | $4.4B | 73.2% | 0.82 | 24.2% | 1.05 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 5/11 |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.EA | $52.9B | $209.70 | $7.5B | $887.0M | 13.1% | 0.22 | 15.4% | 1.05 | 1/9 | 4/9 | 3/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 6 | 6/11 |
| PAYCHEX INCPAYX | $35.4B | $99.31 | $6.5B | $1.8B | 47.1% | 1.22 | 38.6% | 1.26 | 4/9 | 6/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 6/11 |
| Rubrik, Inc.RBRK | $23.4B | $113.80 | $1.3B | $348.8M | 67.1% | — | -26.2% | 1.69 | 1/9 | 0/9 | 0/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 2/11 |
| Grab Holdings LtdGRAB | $12.7B | $3.10 | $3.4B | $268.0M | 4.0% | 0.31 | 1.9% | 1.75 | 2/9 | 2/9 | 2/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 4/11 |
| ROBERT HALF INC.RHI | $3.8B | $36.88 | $5.4B | $133.0M | 10.4% | — | 1.4% | 1.53 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 4/11 |
| CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INCCSGS | $2.3B | $80.04 | $1.2B | $55.9M | 19.7% | 1.90 | 9.7% | 1.44 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 4/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 6 | 4/11 |