Crocs, Inc.
CROXAbout the company
Crocs, Inc. together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women, and kids under the Crocs and HEYDUDE Brands in the United States and internationally. The company offers various footwear products, including clogs, sandals, loafers, classics, fuzz, platforms, boots, sandals, slides, slippers, sneakers, flip flops, and flats, as well as totes, backpacks, belt bags, socks, bag charms, cases, attachments, cartoon characters products, and touchland and other accessories.
Investment snapshot
Positive
3
BUY / PASS
Neutral / negative
2 / 10
NEUTRAL / FAIL
Median fair value
$171.34
+35.8% vs price
Models with upside
5 / 16
Positive margin of safety
Strongest signal
Models split on CROX at $126.14 — fair values range $115.84–$277.51
Key risk
14 of 15 flag CROX's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Buffett +11 more
Framework analysis
| Verdict | Meaning |
|---|---|
| BUY | Positive purchase signal: the framework's buy requirements are met. |
| PASS | The company clears the framework's checklist or screen, but the framework does not produce a buy signal. For valuation frameworks this often means margin of safety is missing, insufficient, or unavailable; some screen-only frameworks have no intrinsic-value BUY state. |
| NEUTRAL | Neither a positive nor negative conclusion. It does not mean to hold an existing position. |
| FAIL | The company does not clear the framework's requirements. |
| Ranked | Ranked strategies do not use PASS: selected cohort is BUY, outside the cohort is FAIL, and unranked is NEUTRAL. |
| Metric | O'Shaughnessy Systematic Factor Composite | Lynch GARP | Buffett Quality Compounder | Pabrai Dhandho Framework | Akre Three-Legged Stool | Schloss Asset-Value Discipline | Neff Low-P/E Total Return | Sleep Scale Economies Shared | Templeton Global Bargain Hunter | Marks Risk-Aware Value | Munger Quality Focus | Ackman Activist Value | Dreman Contrarian Value | Piotroski F-Score | Greenblatt Magic Formula | Graham Defensive Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verdict | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | BUY | FAIL | FAIL | FAIL | NEUTRAL | FAIL | PASS | FAIL · Rank #1169 (Top 36.4%) | FAIL |
| Score | ||||||||||||||||
| Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
| Intrinsic Value | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Margin of Safety | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | +54.5% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +11.0% | N/A | +39.6% | +37.2% | +7.1% | N/A | -8.9% | N/A |
| Data As Of | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-25) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-24) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) | 10-K (2026-08-23) |
Where It Passes
- Valuation models83% pass✓ 5✗ 1▾
Models split on CROX at $126.14 — fair values range $115.84–$277.51
Akre fair value$277.51✓Akre+54.5% margin vs $126.14Templeton fair value$141.81✓Templeton+11.0% margin vs $126.14Munger fair value$208.94✓Munger+39.6% margin vs $126.14Ackman fair value$200.86✓Ackman+37.2% margin vs $126.14Dreman fair value$135.85✓Dreman+7.1% margin vs $126.14Greenblatt fair value$115.84✗Greenblatt-8.9% margin vs $126.14 - Cash Flow60% pass✓ 8✗ 4▾
6 of 10 pass — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Buffett +1 more object
(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+10.41%; #610/4487 (top 13.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionFCF Positive and Growing$659.2M✗LynchPositive and growingFree Cash Flow Proxy$-53.1M✗BuffettPositive and growingP/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=10.4%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures$659.2M✓Neff> $0 (app proxy for a strong fundamental case)Positive Operating Cash Flow frequency20/21 years positive✓SleepPositive OCF in >= 70% of available yearsFCF Positive17/20 years FCF positive✓MarksPositive FCF in majority of recent years(OCF - CapEx) / Market Cap10.4%✓Ackman>= 4%Price / FCF per Share9.6x✓Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)8.9x✗Dreman< 8xOperating Cash Flow$710.4M✓PiotroskiCFO > 0(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=17.02%, ROA=-1.94%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROA
Where It Falls Short
- Profitability7% pass✓ 6✗ 25▾
14 of 15 flag CROX's profitability — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Buffett +11 more
Net income / market capitalization-1.28%; #3391/6251 (top 54.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passROE-6.3%✗Lynch> 15%Net Income Positive (10+ years)15/24 years positive✗BuffettPositive every year for 10+ yearsROE (up to 5-year arithmetic mean)1063.9%✓Buffett> 15% arithmetic mean (app rule)Operating Margin (10-yr trend)3.7% (latest)✓BuffettStable or rising over 10 yearsFree Cash Flow Proxy$-53.1M✗BuffettPositive and growingEarnings Variance (10-yr CoV)1.76✗BuffettCoV < 0.3Retained Earnings Effectiveness✗Buffett$1 retained -> > $1 market value createdMargin of SafetyP/B=4.9x✗PabraiP/B < 1.5 or P/E < 15Return on Equity33.3% (3-yr avg)✓AkreROE > 20% (3-year avg)Positive Diluted-EPS Years6/10 years positive✗Schloss>= 70% positive over 5-10 observed years (app rule)3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR57.1% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 55.8% -> 58.3%, operating margin 26.2% -> 3.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-Year EPS CAGR36.6% CAGR over 4 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Operating Margin Trend26.2% (2023) -> 3.7% (2025)✗TempletonNon-negative operating-margin trend over 3 yearsDiscount to Intrinsic Value7.1% (IV=$135.85 vs Price=$126.14)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valuePositive Net Income Frequency15/20 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 yearsOperating Income / Revenue3.7%✗Ackman>= 15%Net Income / Shareholders Equity-6.3%✗Ackman>= 15%Pre-Tax Income / Revenue1.8%✗Dreman>= 8%Net Income / Shareholders' Equity-6.3%✗Dreman> 12%Net Income / Total Assets-1.94%✗PiotroskiROA > 0ROA Change YoY19.74% -> -1.94% (delta: -21.69%)✗PiotroskiCurrent ROA > Prior ROA(CFO / Total Assets) vs ROACFO/Assets=17.02%, ROA=-1.94%✓PiotroskiCFO/Assets > ROAGross Margin Change YoY58.8% -> 58.3%✗PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / Enterprise Value2.0%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.0%, ROC=50.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Positive EPS (10 years)13/24 years positive✗GrahamPositive EPS every year for 10 yearsEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growth - Valuation17% pass✓ 4✗ 22▾
10 of 12 flag CROX's valuation — Oshaughnessy, Lynch, Schloss +7 more
Revenue / market capitalization+0.6381; #2174/5203 (top 41.8%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionNet income / market capitalization-1.28%; #3391/6251 (top 54.2%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-section(Operating cash flow - capex) / market capitalization+10.41%; #610/4487 (top 13.6%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionTrailing six-month price return through the evaluation date+51.94%; #723/6203 (top 11.7%)✗OshaughnessyTop 10% of eligible cross-sectionBasic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)P/E or FCF YieldFCF Yield=10.4%✓PabraiP/E < 15 or FCF Yield > 10%Price / Book Value per Share4.90x✗SchlossP/B <= 0.80x (app cutoff)✗Templeton< 1.5x✗Dreman< 1.2xPrice / Tangible Book Value per ShareN/A (non-positive TBVPS)✗SchlossP/TBV <= 1.00x (app cutoff)Book Value per Share Change+484.2%✓SchlossLatest BVPS >= earliest BVPS over >= 3 years (app rule)Price / Diluted EPS✗NeffP/E <= 15x (app proxy for a P/E 40%-60% below the market)(EPS CAGR % + Dividend Yield %) / P/E✗Neff> 0.7 (Neff's published traditional edge)Price / EPS✗Templeton< 12x (fixed ceiling; proxy for the market's cheapest 40%)✗Dreman< 12xPrice vs. Trailing Low154% of trailing low ($81.69)✗Templeton<= 120% of trailing low (certified split-adjusted live window)P/B or P/E vs. Historical AverageP/B=4.9x✗MarksP/E < 15 or P/B < 2.0Discount to Intrinsic Value7.1% (IV=$135.85 vs Price=$126.14)✗Marks>= 20% below intrinsic valueValuation ReasonablenessOE Yield=-0.8%✗MungerP/E < 25 or Owner Earnings Yield > 5%Price / FCF per Share9.6x✓Ackman<= 25Price / (CFO / Shares)8.9x✗Dreman< 8xEBIT / Enterprise Value2.0%✗Greenblatt> 10%Earnings Yield + ROC AssessmentEY=2.0%, ROC=50.9%✗GreenblattBoth EY > 10% and ROC > 25%Price / 3-yr avg EPS13.9x✓Graham<= 15xPrice-to-Book Ratio4.9x✗Graham<= 1.5xP/E x P/B68.20✗Graham<= 22.5 - Debt & Leverage18% pass✓ 3✗ 11▾
9 of 11 flag CROX's debt & leverage — Lynch, Buffett, Akre +6 more
Total Debt / Shareholders' Equity0.95x✓SchlossD/E < 1.00x✓Templeton< 1.0 (fixed cap; proxy for below-sector-median leverage)✗Dreman< 0.8Total Debt / Equity0.95✗Lynch< 0.33Cash - Long-term Debt$-1.1B✗LynchPositive preferredDebt/Equity & Interest CoverageD/E: 0.95, IC: 1.9x✗BuffettD/E < 0.5 AND Interest Coverage > 5xDebt Levels0.95✗AkreDebt/Equity < 0.3✗MungerDebt/Equity < 0.5Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.27x✗SchlossCurrent ratio >= 1.50x (app cutoff)✗Dreman> 1.5Interest Coverage & Debt/EBITDAIC=1.9x, D/EBITDA=5.4x✗MarksInterest Coverage > 3x; Debt/EBITDA < 4xTotal Debt / Shareholders Equity0.95✓Ackman<= 1.0LT Debt / Total Assets Change28.04% -> 29.48%✗PiotroskiDecreased YoYLT Debt vs Net Current AssetsLT Debt $1.2B vs NCA $185.8M✗GrahamLT Debt <= Net Current Assets - Verdicts21% pass✓ 3✗ 11▾
Split decision: 10 FAIL · 2 NEUTRAL · 2 PASS · 1 BUY
Overall verdict•OshaughnessyNEUTRAL (Not ranked)✗LynchFAIL (0/7)✓BuffettPASS (4/9)✗PabraiFAIL (1/3)✗AkreFAIL (2/6)✗SchlossFAIL (2/7)✗NeffFAIL (2/6)✓SleepBUY (5/6)✗TempletonFAIL (3/8)✗MarksFAIL (2/5)✗MungerFAIL (1/4)•AckmanNEUTRAL (6/9)✗DremanFAIL (2/11)✓PiotroskiPASS (F-Score 5)✗GreenblattRank #1169✗GrahamFAIL (2/9) - Growth25% pass✓ 5✗ 8▾
6 of 8 flag CROX's growth — Lynch, Neff, Sleep +3 more
Basic earnings-growth PEG (dividends excluded)✗Lynch< 1.0 (ideally < 0.5)3-5 Year EPS CAGR✗Lynch15-30% (Fast Grower); > 0% to passInventory Growth vs Revenue GrowthInv: 3.5% vs Rev: -1.5%✗LynchInventory growth < Revenue growth3-5 Year Diluted EPS CAGR57.1% over 5 years✗Neff7%-20% annualizedRevenue growth vs. gross and operating margin trendgross margin 55.8% -> 58.3%, operating margin 26.2% -> 3.7%✗SleepRevenue rising; gross margin flat or falling; operating margin holding5-year Revenue CAGR23.9%✓SleepCAGR > 7%5-Year EPS CAGR36.6% CAGR over 4 years✓Templeton> 0% (5-year EPS CAGR)Positive Net Income Frequency15/20 years positive✓MarksPositive net income in >= 7 of last 10 years3yr Median Revenue Growth3.5%✗Ackman>= 5%Positive EPS Growth Frequency3/5 years with positive EPS growth✓AckmanPositive EPS growth in >= 3 of last 5 yearsEPS Growth Direction$0.44 (2005) -> $-1.50 (2025)✗DremanPositive over recent yearsEPS CAGR20.8% CAGR over 19 years✓Dreman> 5% annualizedEPS Growth (3-yr avg, 10-yr window)✗Graham>= 33% growth - Efficiency50% pass✓ 6✗ 5▾
4 of 8 pass — Akre, Munger, Dreman +1 more object
ROIC (3-5 yr avg)35.3%✓Buffett> 10%ROIC - WACC+25.3%✓BuffettPositive (WACC = 10%)ROIC (high and growing)FY2023: ROIC=26.3%; FY2024: ROIC=25.3%; FY2025: ROIC=4.7%✗AkreLatest 3 consecutive FYs: ROIC > 15% in eachReinvestment Rate x ROICN/A (non-positive net income)✗AkreReinvestment Rate * ROIC > 10%ROIC (5-year)4/5 years above 12% (latest 4.7%)✓SleepROIC > 12% in a majority of yearsReturn on Invested Capital4.7%✗Munger> 15%Current Assets / Current Liabilities1.27✗Dreman> 1.5Current Ratio Change YoY1.18 -> 1.27✓PiotroskiIncreased YoYRevenue / Total Assets Change YoY0.85x -> 0.97x✓PiotroskiImproved YoYEBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)50.9%✓Greenblatt> 25%Current Ratio1.27✗Graham>= 2.0
Business & financials
Company Profile
Financial Snapshot
Shareholder Return
Fiscal 2025
Retired 11.2% of shares last year, 17.0% over two.
- Buybacks
- $582.3M
- Dividends
- —
What drove EPS
A buyback raises earnings per share without the company earning more. This splits each year's change into the two.
The two parts do not sum exactly to the total — the difference is the cross-term, plus preferred capital where the company has any. It is left visible rather than distributed into the other two.
Share count is the denominator the filer used for diluted EPS, recovered as net income ÷ EPS — not the balance-sheet count, which is a point-in-time figure and would put the timing difference into this split. Years with a loss are omitted: a smaller share count makes a loss per share larger, so the decomposition inverts.
Company Financials
Annual data (10-K) · Last 5 years
| Metric | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.3B | $5.8Best. | $6.1Best. | $7.5Best. | $6.0Best. |
| Revenue | $4.0B↓1% | $4.1B↑4% | $4.0B↑11% | $3.6B↑54% | $2.3B |
| Operating Income | $149.5M↓85% | $1.0B↓1% | $1.0B↑22% | $850.8M↑25% | $683.1M |
| Net Income | -$81.2M↓109% | $950.1M↑20% | $792.6M↑47% | $540.2M↓26% | $725.7M |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.50↓109% | $15.88↑24% | $12.79↑47% | $8.71↓24% | $11.39 |
| Gross Margin | 58.3%↓1% | 58.8%↑5% | 55.8%↑7% | 52.3%↓15% | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7%↓85% | 24.9%↓5% | 26.2%↑9% | 23.9%↓19% | 29.5% |
| ROE | -6.3%↓112% | 51.8%↓5% | 54.5%↓17% | 66.0%↓99% | 5153.3% |
| Total Debt | $1.2B↓9% | $1.3B↓19% | $1.7B↓28% | $2.3B↑201% | $771.4M |
| Shareholders' Equity | $1.3B↓30% | $1.8B↑26% | $1.5B↑78% | $817.9M↑5708% | $14.1M |
| Current Ratio | 1.27↑7% | 1.18↓10% | 1.30↓18% | 1.60↓7% | 1.72 |
| Debt / Equity | 0.95↑29% | 0.74↓36% | 1.14↓60% | 2.84↓95% | 54.78 |
| Operating Cash Flow | $710.4M↓28% | $992.5M↑7% | $930.4M↑54% | $603.1M↑6% | $567.2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $659.2M↓29% | $923.1M↑13% | $814.8M↑63% | $499.0M↓2% | $511.2M |
Score history
Historical Score Timeline
Industry peers
Industry Peers
Similar companies in Apparel
CROX vs Peers — Financial Grading
| Company | Market Cap | Price | Revenue | Net Income | ROE | D/E | Op. Margin | Curr. Ratio | Graham | Buffett | Lynch | Greenblatt | Piotroski | Dreman |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINTAS CORPCTAS | $79.0B | $197.74 | $10.3B | $1.8B | 38.7% | 0.52 | 22.8% | 2.09 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 5 | 5/11 |
| TAPESTRY, INC.TPR | $22.8B | $114.12 | $7.0B | $183.2M | 21.4% | 2.79 | 5.9% | 1.87 | 1/9 | 3/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 5 | 3/11 |
| Amer Sports, Inc.AS | $15.2B | $27.24 | $6.6B | $427.4M | 7.4% | 0.14 | 10.7% | 1.50 | 2/9 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 4/11 |
| DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPDECK | $10.8B | $77.68 | $5.5B | $1.0B | 41.0% | — | 23.1% | 3.54 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |
| lululemon athletica inc.LULU | $10.7B | $96.87 | $11.1B | $1.6B | 31.8% | 0.00 | 19.9% | 2.26 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 3/3 | F-Score 4 | 5/11 |
| On Holding AGONON | $9.9B | $29.55 | $3.8B | $257.3M | 12.5% | 0.32 | 12.5% | 2.71 | 2/9 | 5/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 4/11 |
| Gildan Activewear Inc.GIL | $7.9B | $42.62 | $3.6B | $398.9M | 11.2% | 1.21 | 17.1% | 2.11 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 0/3 | F-Score 4 | 5/11 |
| LEVI STRAUSS & COLEVI | $7.6B | $19.75 | $6.3B | $578.1M | 25.4% | 0.46 | 10.8% | 1.55 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 2/7 | 1/3 | F-Score 7 | 5/11 |